Thursday, February 20, 2020

Neo-colonialism & the South Fly

Martyn Namarong

By MARTYN NAMORONG - PNG Attitude

PORT MORESBY - Recent media reports have highlighted the problems faced by Daru in terms of its ailing infrastructure and the chronic shortages of almost everything that could make urban life liveable.
Daru is a stone’s throw away from the first world existence of Australia yet a million miles away from access to reliable safe clean drinking water, decent sanitation and healthcare. Port Moresby doesn’t know Daru although it pretends to call it the capital of its Western Province. What Port Moresby knows about its neo-colonial territory of Western Province is the giant Ok Tedi copper mine which is Papua New Guinea’s main foreign exchange earner.
To understand what is wrong with South Fly is to first look at the big picture before delving down into the minutiae of the problems faced by this district.
THE BIG PICTURE
South Fly District is carved out of mainland PNG by the Fly River which runs from the northwest PNG-Indonesia border towards the south east into the Coral Sea. It has a land mass of over 31,000 square kilometers, enough to fit in the highlands provinces of Simbu, Eastern Highlands, Western Highlands and Jiwaka and still have a lot of breathing space.
The district’s enormous size presents a logistical nightmare when trying to deliver basic government services to people scattered over such a large area. This is further compounded by the fact that, like every other district in PNG, it only receives around K10 million each year from the national government. Imagine trying to deliver goods and services to the provinces of Simbu, Eastern Highlands, Western Highlands and Jiwaka with only K10 million.
Its problems are also structural. Some of these issues are unique to the district and are the outcomes of broader historical processes that have produced present realities. When PNG gained independence in 1975, the preamble to its constitution declared the nation’s self-affirmation on the global stage. However, in its subsequent sections, the constitution also gave effect to the instruments and institutions of colonisation.
In effect the PNG constitution is a bit of an oxymoron in that it declares a PNG identity and then goes on to suppress that by empowering the tools of colonial power. The consequence of this constitutional contradiction is that colonisation in PNG now has a Melanesian face with the neo-colonial powers being in Waigani and the colonies at the periphery.
Thus, for the people of South Fly, those along the borders of Indonesia and Australia had their fate sealed by Port Moresby, Canberra and Jakarta. Take for example the ‘treaty villages’ along the Torres Strait which have been deprived of any commercial gains from fisheries thanks to the Torres Straits Treaty. Although one would assume the border villages would be far more developed given their proximity to larger and more advanced economies, they are amongst the most poorest and disadvantaged in the district.
Recent work done by Professor Mark Moran and his team from the University of Queensland show that the level of poverty in these areas is comparable to that of sub-Saharan Africa.
As Professor Moran and his team noted:
“The close pre-colonial relationships between people in the South Fly and Torres Strait Islands, which typically fostered mutual benefits for both parties, were transformed when PNG gained independence in 1975. Since then, the benefits coming to Torres Strait Islanders along with their Australian citizenship have steadily increased, lifting their living standards.
“Meanwhile, the situation in the South Fly has deteriorated: the people have received limited support from the PNG Government and environmental damage due to irresponsible mining practices has damaged the marine environment on which they depend.
“[The] asymmetries on the PNG side of the border have deepened further as the management of the Torres Strait Treaty has gradually hardened.”
Other structural problems are not unique to the people of South Fly. Waigani’s negative relationship with the periphery is well documented with the Bougainville civil war being the most infamous.
The growing calls for autonomy from the periphery reflect the level of mistrust felt by the margins of their neo-colonial masters in Waigani.
Take for instance the idiosyncrasies of the Waigani imposed administration. Provinces, districts, local level governments (LLGs) and wards exist merely as decorative shells giving a perception of administrative power and control by the regions.
Many ‘provincial’ sectors of administration are actually controlled from Port Moresby with neither the local political leaders nor administrators in charge. And so the ‘Provincial’ Police Commander is accountable to Konedobu, and the ‘District’ Finance Manager reports to the Finance Department in Waigani.
In Waigani’s language these are ‘national functions’ operating at the provincial or district level. The use of the terms ‘provincial’ or ‘district’ refer to geographic descriptions of the roles as opposed to any form of local political or administrative autonomy.
And so a major development challenge faced not just by South Fly but other regions of PNG is that the political and administrative heads of provinces, districts and LLGs are rather impotent when dealing with officers who are accountable to Waigani and not the local authorities.
How do these local generals command their soldiers when the soldiers receive marching orders from Waigani?
The battle against entropy in the provinces and districts is lost even before the war has begun because of the command structure. Thus entropy has won, is winning and will continue to win unless generals and soldiers are under one command structure.
What I am saying is nothing new. It was recognised at the dawn of PNG’s independence and has continued to be articulated by various parties in various forms.
Unfortunately, the viceroys of the new empire which was inherited from our colonial masters in 1975 remain stubborn in their grasp of power and privilege.
Thus when a Member for South Fly receives the K10 million district service improvement grant with all the strings Waigani has attached, it is dispensed according to Waigani’s guidelines to implementing officers who are ultimately accountable to Waigani.
The local member of parliament acts like a postmaster for Waigani. If one is to understand some of the unconventional behaviour of some MPs one must understand the power play and potential political suicide that faces them.
THE SMALL PICTURE
And with this we segue into the small picture for the people of South Fly.
Ask anyone on Daru Island what is wrong with service delivery and the two things they mention are lack of political leadership and a corrupt public service.
But, as I have noted earlier, whilst these two concerns are genuine, the problems are larger than that.
Both the political leadership and civil service face the unenviable task of delivering goods and services to a scattered population over a large geographical area with very limited resources.
The local MP, the police commander and education and health advisors simply do not have the capacity to deliver to the entire electorate. Yet they are expected to perform miracles. And when they fail they are accused of being corrupt.
Funds from Waigani also are notoriously late or never sent - and guess who gets blamed for the lack of service?
But on the occasion that funds do arrive, the administrative idiosyncrasies discussed earlier kick into place thus there is lack of accountability at the local level.
South Fly District is only as accountable as Waigani holds it to account. Even Daru has not much control over Daru as, in many cases, Daru reports to Waigani.
On Daru Island it’s always the next person who is the problem.
Everyone seems blindsided by their own self-righteousness. And so, as individuals fail to reflect on their own personal weakness and correct them, the process of growth and improvement fails to happen.
On my first trip down to Daru, I met a couple of District Development Authority board members who kept blaming the public servants for many of the issues in the district.
But as I looked through some of the decisions I wondered if the DDA board was not playing its role. Many of the board members I spoke to didn’t fully understand their roles and responsibilities.
I asked them, “Do you know that you are in charge of looking after the yam house that belongs to the people of South Fly?”
“Do you know that the rats cannot eat the yams unless you give approvals at the DDA board meetings?”
“How can you blame the rats for eating from the yams from the yam house when you gave approval to the rats to get hold of the yams at the first place?”
You can imagine how the board members performed at subsequent board meetings.
GOING FORWARD
There needs to be a lot of individual reflection and soul searching on Daru Island with more empathy for the next person on the island.
Everyone needs to examine their own strengths and weaknesses and to see the goodness in others that can be leveraged to move the district forward.
The people of South Fly need to recognise the systems and structures that have been imposed on them since 1975 and organise themselves better to be able to make the systems work for them.
Go to this link for more: https://www.pngattitude.com/2020/02/neo-colonialism-the-south-fly.html

Wednesday, February 19, 2020

Whistleblower act passed

Marape

By JAMES MARAPE
| Facebook | Extract
Yesterday PNG's parliament passed a law to protect whistleblowers but a bill to establish an Independent Commission Against Corruption will have to go to a parliamentary committee before being voted on. Mr Marape wrote this before parliament sat - KJ
PORT MORESBY - I gained office with no money, no political party, no lobbyist, and not too many friends except a few loyalists including MPs and the general people of Papua New Guinea who wanted change plus the Hand of my Creator God.
Please circulate that I don’t have agents and if anyone, whether the fake accounts holders in Facebook or others in private who might request help as if coming from me, report them.
Talk about fighting corruption, we hopefully should pass Independent Commission Against Corruption tomorrow (Tuesday).
It is in our government’s program and all MPs including the opposition have been told that this is a Marape-Steven government’s priority legislation, including whistle blowers act.
This ICAC bill will set the institution that should assist us fighting corruption and we will build it where it is free from politics and become an agent that assist transforming our country into the future.
Other lead corruption fighting agencies like Transparency International, the Ombudsman, the police plus the judiciary will be called upon to assist set up the structure of ICAC.
The Whistleblowers Act we will pass also protects those who report corruption so I request those who have evidence of corruption in our country, prepare to take cover under our Whistleblowers Act and report them.
Many governments have promised ICAC but myself and Hon Davis Steven as Attorney-General and our present parliament including ministers have pledged to deliver this [yesterday].
PNG, I placed minister Kramer to fight corruption and he is giving his best shot. I am slowly but surely placing public service appointments I feel will assist us get there, like the appointment of a reknowned corruption fighter Sam Koim to the Internal Revenue Commission, as a few small examples.
Rome was not built in one day or one year, we have a long way to go in PNG but we making the first correct painful baby steps.
When you see wrong and corruption, assist being an agent of law by providing your evidence and helping us take back PNG, instead of just being a Facebook or cyber complainant.
Whilst on corruption, the last few days an issue on a gas license transaction that took place during minister Duma’s time as petroleum minister has been a public concern.
I am concerned too and, just like other allegations, I have requested detailed scrutiny of this allegation raised by foreign media.
Minister Duma has been asked to provide his side of the story and into the future greater light will unravel this matter too.
Again if anyone of you have any interest or information on this then Facebook is not the forum but responsible offices including the police and Ombudsman.
This country is here to stay and some of these will be work in progress so have faith we will get there.
Let’s all work wherever we are placed.

Booting Exxon boosts Marape – for now

Broken exxon

By BAL KAMA
| The Interpreter | Lowy Institute
CANBERRA - The recent announcement of the Papua New Guinea government to cease all negotiations with one of the United States’ largest oil and gas companies, Exxon Mobil, over the P’nyang LNG project, a new gas field in PNG, has broader implications for the US and PNG.
At first glance, the decision against Exxon for allegedly acting in bad faith is part of a wider crackdown by the government of prime minister James Marape to ensure greater fairness in the resource sector.
Since ousting then–prime minister Peter O’Neill in a vote of no-confidence in 2019, Marape has charted a different approach from that of his predecessor, under the banner of ‘Take Back PNG’ – a larger policy objective to reassess PNG’s developmental direction and regain lost opportunities.
Marape laid out his vision in his inaugural visit to Australia in 2019 and is gradually applying it in many sectors.
The decision illustrates the growing frustrations of dealing with investors in resource-rich PNG, and it further demonstrates an emerging crop of PNG leaders confident in reassessing the status quo.
For the US, Exxon’s alleged conduct, criticised by the PNG government as being “exploitative”, undermines US efforts in the Pacific region as a force for good.
Exxon Mobil has a US$19 billion liquefied natural gas project in PNG (PNG LNG), which made its first shipment in 2014.
The PNG LNG project, which remains the largest economic investment by the US in the Pacific, coincided with former US president Barack Obama’s announcement in 2012 of a “pivot to the Pacific” policy.
The geopolitical scenario of the day, the excitement of having the US interested in PNG, and the high expectations surrounding a global and reputable company, among other factors, influenced the PNG government’s initial agreement for Exxon to operate the PNG LNG project.
It was thought the deal would have a transformational impact on PNG’s economy – an assurance that continues to be projected by some quarters.
However, the overall economy of PNG did not experience the projected windfall. Instead, there were a series of negative outcomes over the years at both a national and a local level – national debts grew, and unfavourable benefit-sharing arrangements and royalties led to conflict among traditional resource landowners.
Many have questioned whether the resource boom marked by the PNG LNG project was in fact a “resource curse”.
The ousting of prime minister Peter O’Neill in 2019 was partly a result of growing grievances over the failure to deliver on the promises of the Exxon-led project and other resource deals. An important issue was the high level of concessions made in those deals.
Historically, PNG governments, desperate to become investor-friendly, have made hasty concessions that often disadvantaged the country from having a fair share of the revenue from the development of their resources.
In a 2016 report, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) observed that “the tax arrangements for PNG’s mining and petroleum sectors are very generous compared to other resource-rich countries and do not reflect the maturity of the PNG resource sector”.
The World Bank, in a 2017 report, also found particularly for the Exxon-led LNG project that Exxon Mobil and its PNG LNG partners created “a complex web of exemptions and allowances that effectively mean that little revenue is received by government and landowners”.
The PNG government must share some burden of fault for creating this scenario – including, for instance, the failures by previous PNG governments to negotiate a favourable outcome for the country, the misuse of funds by political leaders, a politicised bureaucracy unable to carry out their due diligence, and judicial interventions that at times hinder payments to disgruntled landowners.
This does not, however, excuse Exxon and its partners from the grave unfairness suggested in these reports. This, together with his experience as a minister in previous governments, underpinned Marape’s firm stance on taking a different approach in the current deal on the P’nyang LNG project.
In his appeal for Exxon Mobil to act fairly, Marape noted that “the initial terms [in the PNG LNG project] provided by PNG were so generous” and that new “reasonable terms” should be considered for the P’nyang project.
The terms proposed by the PNG government are not publicly available, but they appear to include giving no fiscal concessions in P'nyang, treating it as separate project from the current LNG projects and increasing domestic market obligations, local content participation, and landowner’s royalties from the current rate of two percent.
The prime minister described Exxon’s refusal to accept the terms as a move to “extract even more profit for themselves”, while Kerenga Kua, the minister for petroleum and energy denounced Exxon as acting in “absolute bad faith” and coming into PNG “with a determination to exploit our vulnerabilities, exploit us for our weak economic position and take advantage of us”.
The firm position taken by the Marape government is historic – no previous government has ever taken such an approach. PNG has had resource deals in the past that have resulted unfavourably for the country, but past governments have been shown to align more closely with investors than with their citizens.
The leaders and the people of PNG appear to be supportive of Marape’s approach. Further, the government is considering amending and tightening the legislative framework to ensure an equitable resource sector.
Marape is unlikely to concede to Exxon Mobil, as he insists: “You win for your shareholders, and I win for my people”.
James Donald, a member of parliament representing the area where P’nyang LNG site is located, cautioned Exxon against crossing “a line between commercial parity and commercial greed”. Other MPs representing the resource areas have also demonstrated support for Marape’s stance against Exxon.
The PNG government is likely to reconsider its current position if Exxon responds positively to its terms. Unless that happens, however, there appears to be a general distrust for Exxon among the people of PNG – a situation far from the hope Exxon represented when it first entered the country.
The distrust for Exxon has broader implications when one considers Exxon not only represents US economic prestige in the Pacific, but a society whose business ideals are expected to reflect the democratic values of fairness and just outcomes.
The longer this tussle between Exxon and the PNG Government continues, the greater the distrust is likely to be, not only for Exxon, but for what it represents – the United States – in the Pacific.
As the vote of no-confidence scheme against a sitting government in PNG resumes later this year, those affected by Marape’s firm policies may hope for a change in government. In the fluid political landscape of PNG, a populist and comparatively principled Marape faces a challenge beyond just his immediate political rivals, and inside company boardrooms.
However, if anything, his approach to governance so far has been reassuring for the people of Papua New Guinea.

Whistleblower Act passed



By HELEN TARAWA - The National
PARLIAMENT unanimously passed (90-0) the Whistleblower Act 2020, a giant step forward in PNG’s fight against corruption.
Deputy Prime Minister David Steven, the Minister for Justice and Attorney-General, said the legislation was part of the initiative to address corruption and will complement anti-corruption initiatives.
He said the new law was “a conduit for employees that note suspicious improprieties to make protected disclosure in accordance with relevant disclosure channels”.
“The concept of whistleblowing of impropriety has been introduced in other jurisdictions including our region. Often such disclosures have been difficult as employees who observed such improprieties risked being met with reprisals. “The bill is a modest approach in establishing protection mechanisms for employees,” he said.
He however warned that the bill was not the only solution to dealing with corruption.
“(It is) a piece of the anti-corruption system that will encourage a culture of accountability and transparency,” he said.
The new legislation is designed to:
  • provide procedures for employees to report suspected improprieties in the workplace;
  • Protect employees who make protected disclosures from occupational detriment; and,
  • Provide remedies to employees who suffer occupational detriment having made protected disclosures.
It enables employees to disclose any suspicious impropriety within their workplace including a criminal offence, a failure to comply with a legal obligation, a miscarriage of justice, endangering the health and safety of an individual, environment damage, unfair discrimination and deliberately concealing any conduct mentioned above.
There are four types of protected disclosures;
  • A legal practitioner in the course of obtaining legal advice. It is protected disclosure only if the disclosure is done in good faith and in the course of obtaining legal advice.
  • protected discloser to an employer. If the disclosure is made in good faith and either made in accordance with an approved international reporting procedure or whether there is no approved international procedure directly to the employer or employee’s immediate supervisor.
  • protected disclosure to a minister. It also applies to statutory office holders and employees to statutory bodies who are not officers of the public service. It is protected disclosure if made in good faith and to the minister responsible for relevant Act or statutory body; and,
  • the protected disclosure to an approved authority.

Go to this link for more: https://www.thenational.com.pg/whistleblower-act-passed/

Yalinu set on cleaner future



Posted by The National

A PAPUA New Guinean who is doing her PhD studies at the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom has an ambition to create a cleaner and safer way to produce ammonia to feed the world’s population more sustainably.
Yalinu Poya, who is a final-year PhD student in chemistry, said her research was focused on using affordable materials to make a catalyst that was able to produce ammonia in a clean way using less harsh reaction conditions and less energy.
“The Haber–Bosch process uses its conventional iron catalysts in large scale plants, meanwhile I make and use cobalt rhenium supported on magnesium oxide catalysts which are potentially more suitable for small scale localised plants (such as on a farm) that can be powered by wind energy,” she said.
It is estimated that the world’s population will reach 9.1 billion by the year 2050, and consequently food production will need to rise by 70 per cent to keep up with global demands.
Farmers will require more fertilisers to maintain fertile soil in order to produce healthy crops, which will result in an increased demand in the production of fertilisers.
Since ammonia is the main component in fertilisers, it too will need to increase in production.
To maintain food security, ammonia needs to be produced in enormous amounts through the Haber–Bosch process.
Through this ingenious invention, over 450 million tonnes of fertiliser is produced annually and it is estimated that 40 per cent of the world is being fed through it.
Unfortunately, this industrial technology annually consumes two per cent of the world’s energy and contributes to global warming by releasing 1.6 per cent of man-made carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
“My country, Papua New Guinea, is a developing country that is affected by many things, one of them being climate change,” Poya said.
“Located in the Pacific Ocean, we along, with other Pacific island nations, are feeling the drastic effects of global warming.
With the sea level rising, most of our islands are sinking, and my people of the Pacific are highly affected.”
“I am pleased that my research can potentially contribute new perspectives to worldwide sustainability to help tackle some of the problems of climate change that affect my country, neighbouring Pacific island nations, other vulnerable developing nations, and moreover the planet.”
Poya said she chose to study at the University of Glasgow because of its world-changing research and notable alumni.
“The University of Glasgow’s school of chemistry alone has alumni like Joseph Black, who discovered magnesium and Fred Soddy, who discovered isotopes,” she said.
“All of these Nobel Prize winners come from here, so why not me!”
Poya said studying chemistry at the University of Glasgow was an enormous honour.
“I am working alongside world-leading research groups and using first-class facilities,” she said.
“My goal is to graduate successfully with a PhD and I will use the knowledge and skills I gain in my studies to present chemistry and catalysis as a solution to the real global problems that our world faces.”
Glasgow University said Poya was one of its future world changers: students with ambitions to improve lives across the world.

Go to this link for more: https://www.thenational.com.pg/yalinu-set-on-cleaner-future/?fbclid=IwAR08QhQxnP49ksvuPOY0ef_zXr_5nsx1junrN9r7jPnJtx2kBPK93MBwI0o

Monday, February 17, 2020

MARAPE REWARDS & EMBRACES CORRUPTION IF HE DOES NOT SACK DUMA



By Isabella Tauri - PNG Blog

Marape has again rewarded Mr Corruption and one of PNG people's greatest thief William DUMA through a Government Decision NOT to investigate further, effect arrest nor sack William DUMA as a State Minister!

Never forget this is the same William Corruption Duma who stole millions from the Manumanu Land Deal, together with Fabian Pok.  The people of PNG protested on Facebook for their removal but Peter O'Neill kept them until the Government changed in May 2019.
The people's expectations were on Marape to live by his words - to be the people's PM!  But Marape's true hidden colors are now showing.

First, he rewarded DUMA with a State Minister portfolio end of last year.  All for political survival!
Now that both local and international media has exposed DUMA's corruption in abusing public office as a State Minister for personal gain, Marape has made another decision to NOT DO ANYTHING about DUMA's corruption.

Instead, he is taking K28 Million of public funds to fund further investigation on the UBS Loan saga, which he himself as Finance Minister was 100% responsible for. 
We the people of PNG already got robbed of K3 Billion by Marape and his cohorts in the former O'Neill regime.  Why is he so defiant to ROB us AGAIN to pay hell knows who and what for money that we shall never recover?

The litmus test in now on Marape:   WILL HE BE A TRUE LEADER TO SACK DUMA AND INVESTIGATE HIM TOO?

If nothing is done then it may mean Marape himself may have personally benefited from these deals.  He will protect Duma at all costs!
The Fact that Marape embraces and rewards CORRUPTION means he is indeed an accessory to all these corruption and is corrupt as well.  He does not care about the welfare of Papua New Guineans as he plays lip service in his preachings.
So Papua New Guineans, stop your little Christian preachings, understand the magnitude of this corruption and decisions.
TIME TO START A NEW REVOLUTION AND REMOVE CORRUPT LEADERS!


Go to this link for more: http://www.pngblogs.com/2020/02/marape-rewards-embraces-corruption-if.html

Featured Post

Cashless in China as I study for my PhD

                                WeChat and Alipay digital payment applications By BETTY GABRIEL WAKIA - posted on PNG Attitude Blog PORT MOR...